HomeAbout › Cemil Ertürk

Cemil Ertürk

Cemil Ertürk is the researcher and engineer behind QuantMedia. He writes the research, builds the data pipeline that produces the site's proprietary metrics, and maintains the open implementations that accompany the papers.

Stated plainly, because it matters more than a biography. QuantMedia is an independent, one-person research project. It is not affiliated with any university, fund, broker or financial institution, and nothing on this site is peer reviewed. No professional licence or institutional credential is claimed anywhere on this site, and none should be inferred. The research is published so that it can be checked, not because an institution vouches for it.

Research areas

These are the areas the published work actually covers, each linked to the research itself rather than asserted:

How the research is approached

Four working rules, each of which is enforced by something in the codebase rather than being a statement of intent:

Built and maintained

ComponentWhat it is
Daily confluence scan A 30-signal technical engine scored across a fixed 180-name liquid US universe, run after every close.
Signal Breadth Index Share of the universe clearing the 22-of-30 threshold, with published formula, JSON and history.
Sector Confluence Index The same scan grouped and ranked by sector.
VPIN implementation Equal-volume bucketing, bulk volume classification and the tick rule. 15 tests.
HRP implementation Correlation distance, linkage, quasi-diagonalisation and recursive bisection, with baselines. 13 tests.
PSR calculator Client-side calculator showing every intermediate value so the result can be checked by hand.

Selected research

Verifiable profiles

Only accounts that genuinely exist are listed here. There is no ORCID or Google Scholar profile, because no peer-reviewed publication record exists to attach one to.

Corrections

Errors get corrected in place and the change is recorded rather than quietly overwritten — the editorial policy sets out how. A published worked example for the Probabilistic Sharpe Ratio was found to be arithmetically wrong and was corrected against scipy; that correction is disclosed on the paper itself. If you find a mistake, say so.